How we compare to what you are probably evaluating.
Named honestly, hedged where it should be, and current as of July 2026.
The descriptions below reflect publicly available product information as of July 2026 and describe common patterns, not guarantees about any specific plan or contract. Product names and trademarks belong to their respective owners; references are for comparison only and do not imply affiliation or endorsement. Always verify against the vendor directly.
01How is this different from Cvent or other enterprise suites?
Enterprise suites are genuinely more capable across the widest range of event types, and they have a track record measured in decades plus support organizations we cannot match today. The tradeoffs buyers most often describe are configuration depth that expects formal training and implementation timelines measured in months. We are built for a narrower job — conferences — with setup measured in an afternoon and an assistant that can do the configuring for you. If you need a global enterprise standard across hundreds of events a year, buy the suite. We will say that on a sales call too.
02How is this different from Swoogo, Bizzabo, or similar platforms?
This is the closest comparison, and these are good products. The meaningful differences are structural rather than feature-count: your ticket money goes to your own Stripe account rather than through the vendor, your deployment is isolated rather than a tenant in a shared system, and your own AI assistant can take approved actions rather than only reading data. Several platforms in this segment now offer read-only AI connections; the step we have taken is letting the assistant change things, bounded by the role on its key and fully audited.
03How is this different from Whova and event apps?
Event apps are one layer of a conference — the attendee experience. We include that layer as an installable web app with opt-in notifications, and then also run the CFP, the ticketing, the sponsors, the money, and the reporting behind it. If you only need an attendee app, a dedicated app is a reasonable purchase.
04How is this different from Eventbrite, Luma, or a stack of point tools?
Those tools are excellent at their individual jobs and hard to beat for a single simple event. The cost shows up when a conference needs six of them: the same speaker typed into a CFP tool, a scheduling tool, an email tool, and a sponsor spreadsheet, with no single place that is right. We are one system holding all of it, and with general ticketing platforms specifically, the other common complaint is waiting for your money — see the payouts answer above. That said, we do not think you should have to abandon a tool your community already lives in, so you can point the event at your existing ticket page and keep selling there while running the conference here. To be straight about the limit: that is a link hand-off, not a data sync, and we do not have a Luma API integration — we started one and removed it rather than ship something half-connected.
05What are you honestly not good at yet?
Sponsor lead-capture badge scanning, onsite badge printing, AI attendee matchmaking, and SMS are on the roadmap and not shipped — they are marked "coming soon" on the comparison page rather than buried. We are a young product with a small team, so we do not have a decade of references or a 24/7 phone support floor. What you get instead is direct access to the people building it.